13 תשובות
היא טועה, רגע אני עובדת על תגובה
שואל השאלה:
סבבה תודהה
סבבה תודהה
אנונימית
first, israel fully withdrew from the gaza strip in 2005 dismantling all settlements and removing every soldier. since then, the area has been governed not by israel, but by hamas, which is recognized as a terrorist organization by the us, eu, and others. hamas has consistently launched rocket attacks at israeli civilian areas, which is why israel enforces a blockade alongside egypt to try to prevent weapons smuggling. its a security measure, not arbitrary oppression.
as for the west bank (not west jordan), the situation is indeed more complicated. israel gained control of this area in a defensive war in 1967, after being attacked by neighboring arab states. since then, peace talks have been attempted multiple times notably in 2000 and 2008 but were rejected by palestinian leadership. many israelis worry that a full withdrawal could lead to another gaza-like situation, with attacks on major cities like tel aviv or jerusalem.
no one is denying that palestinians face difficulties. but its not as one-sided as it may seem. palestinian authorities also bear responsibility for rejecting peace offers, inciting violence, and failing to invest in their own people. israelis want peace but not at the cost of their own survival.
the conflict deserves empathy for both sides. oversimplifying it into "israel bad, palestine good" doesnt help the people who actually live with the consequences.
צ'אט גיפיטי עזר לסכם, תגידי אם משהו לא עובד לך ואשנה
as for the west bank (not west jordan), the situation is indeed more complicated. israel gained control of this area in a defensive war in 1967, after being attacked by neighboring arab states. since then, peace talks have been attempted multiple times notably in 2000 and 2008 but were rejected by palestinian leadership. many israelis worry that a full withdrawal could lead to another gaza-like situation, with attacks on major cities like tel aviv or jerusalem.
no one is denying that palestinians face difficulties. but its not as one-sided as it may seem. palestinian authorities also bear responsibility for rejecting peace offers, inciting violence, and failing to invest in their own people. israelis want peace but not at the cost of their own survival.
the conflict deserves empathy for both sides. oversimplifying it into "israel bad, palestine good" doesnt help the people who actually live with the consequences.
צ'אט גיפיטי עזר לסכם, תגידי אם משהו לא עובד לך ואשנה
שואל השאלה:
תודהה איזה מלכה
תודהה איזה מלכה
אנונימית
בכיף
פרח לא יזיק לי חחחח
יש הרבה דעות בנושא, עדיף לדבר על זה פנים מול פנים או למצוא דרך להסביר מה את חושבת .
infact, israel never tried to occupy any land, israel agreed with the
partition plan given by the un. (agreed by the whole world)
the ones who did not agree to the plan, were the palestinians, who's started a war to take our land as soon as they could. israel had to fight in order to protect itself (by the way, there been voices in the palestinian community during the war saying: "throw all jewish families to the sea!" "do a second holocaust!" , so israel had to another reason to fight for independence, to protect their people.)
israel will leave the palestinian lands the moment terror surrenders, but they won't do so, so israel has to stay to keep an eye inside the land.
the other options are leaving active terrorist organizations just a few km's away from your civilians, which would be harmful for the whole country.
partition plan given by the un. (agreed by the whole world)
the ones who did not agree to the plan, were the palestinians, who's started a war to take our land as soon as they could. israel had to fight in order to protect itself (by the way, there been voices in the palestinian community during the war saying: "throw all jewish families to the sea!" "do a second holocaust!" , so israel had to another reason to fight for independence, to protect their people.)
israel will leave the palestinian lands the moment terror surrenders, but they won't do so, so israel has to stay to keep an eye inside the land.
the other options are leaving active terrorist organizations just a few km's away from your civilians, which would be harmful for the whole country.
סיכום עוד מקום המדינה ^
אם יש טעויות דקדוק זה יעשה את זה יותר אותנטי אל דאגה
^נראה יותר חסר השכלה אתה מתכוון? אבל כע, גם יותר אותנטי הולך חחחח
חסר השכלה ואת ליטרלי הלכת לchatgpt
^כי אני עצלנית, זה בעיה אחרת, הוא לא אמר משהו שלא ידעתי
אבל צחקתי איתך הכל בסדר אל תיקח אישית
אבל צחקתי איתך הכל בסדר אל תיקח אישית
באותו הנושא: